This is  NOT  an official Fan Page.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Use adjectives to describe what you feel about the dance style.
I prefer Lambada, Danca da Vida for the faster dance.
dancers before they danced for Kaoma, at least as far back as 1985 . Multi partner
dancing is evident in many of the Kaoma dance videos, including their first video.
Look for the time lines in the two videos. The two video are slow to load.
You are going to see Braz doz Santos and Gabriella Turbiani. performing a part of the
Origins of Lambada Dancing:. Lambada dancing is a product of the African and
dance sometimes referred to as the "Soaring Eagles Courtship Dance".
South American continent with seasoning from all the world. Traditional Lambada
requires that one foot always be in contact with the earth. Notice that "drops" are
an unsupported drop in Lambada, Danca da Vida, that employs special hand-holds. It
usually supportefd on the thigh of the male in Lambada, Danca da Vida. There is also
should only be used by longtime partners. In Lambada, Danca Elegante, the males
encircles the females forearm above the wrist during otherwise unsupported drops.
.
Both styles of Lambada dancing are courtship dances.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
AFTRA commenced negotiations for a music video contract on June 21, 2011 with
representatives of Sony, UMG, Warner, EMI, Disney and most of their subsidiary
labels. While AFTRA has placed a high priority on achieving a fair agreement,
industry representatives have been slow in responding to AFTRA’s proposal and
setting dates for continued negotiations.
What can AFTRA members do to help? Follow AFTRA and Dancers' Alliance on
Twitter, share the video with friends on Facebook and help spread the word about
this campaign. It's About Time!
ASK AFTRA

AFTRA LOCALS
Use the map below to select a local
office or click here to view a full list.
AGENT RELATIONS
Agency Home
Forms and contracts
Contact Agency Department
FAQs
- Franchised Agents - Atlanta Boston Chicago Cleveland Dallas-Ft. Worth Denver
Detroit Houston Kansas City Los Angeles Miami Nashville New York Philadelphia
Phoenix Pittsburgh Portland San Diego San Francisco Seattle St. Louis Tri-State
Twin Cities Washington-Baltimore
FOR EMPLOYERS
Rates and Contracts  
Video Game Registration
Forms  
Young Performers  
Safety Bulletins  
Contact AFTRA Staff   

MEMBERS ONLY
Pay Your Dues | Update Status | Show Sheets | Member Guides  
Forgot Password?
New User? Register Here
http://www.aftra.org/contracts.htm
http://www.aftra.org/AFTRA_Dancers.htm
http://www.aftra.org/31241A5562EC47A48510253BA316F306.htm
http://www.youtube.com/dancersalliance

on Twitter through AFTRA (@aftra)
         Dancers Alliance (@dancersalliance).
For more information contact Steve Sidawi ssidawi@aftra.com or 323.634.8118.
.
Do not corrupt the name of the dance with a compound  or hyphenated noun.
parners at the same time. Both styles were danced by some of the Kaoma
.
.
.
.
.
.
Copyright, performance royalties, and royalty law are in constant review all over the
world. It might be a good idea for all the Kaoma dancers to get together and compile a
list of all their stage names , legal names, legal addresses, spouses heirs, etc. and hire
legal counsel and review recovery fees as a percentage of royaltys recovered.
Royalties are sometimes collected for dance performances in film and video.
Royalties are disbursed at so much money per performance. Each time a video is
viewed all the professional dancers in the video may be due an equal royalty,
whether the dancer is identified or not identified. Royalties of unidentified dancers
will never be disbursed among identified dancers. Those royalties are simply held in
trust.
Suppose that for the sake of discussion each professional dancer receive one tenth of
one penny (.001) for each time that a video is legally aired.
Someone named igloows uploaded a copy of Chorando Se Foi on June 28, 2006 and
it was removed by copyright claim on march 09, 2011 after 92,484,526 viewings. It
was being viewed 250,000 times per day when pulled off the net.
In a years time that would be 91,250,000 viewings. There are at least 6 professional
dancers in the video.
These example numbers were chosen to help explain how royalties can add up, and
have no basis in fact whatsoever. In reality they do not exist.
Royalties due each dancer @ .01 per viewing = 91,250,000 x $.01 = $912,500.00
Royalties due each dancer @ .001 per viewing = 91,250,000 x  $.001 = $91,250.00
Royalties due each dancer @ .0001 per viewing = 91,250,000 x $.0001 = $9,125.00
Royalties due each dancer @ .00001 per viewing =91,250,000 x $.00001 = $912.50

The online campaign began with a video message from dancer and choreographer
Galen Hooks, who is a AFTRA Los Angeles Board member and a leader of the
Dancers’ Alliance. Other participants include choreographer/director Brian Friedman,
former Pussycat Doll Carmit Bachar, comedian Affion Crockett and many
established dancers, including Bryan Tanaka, Randi Kemper and Shaun Evaristo.
New videos will be released over the coming weeks at www.youtube.
com/dancersalliance, and can be followed on Twitter through AFTRA (@aftra) and
the Dancers Alliance (@dancersalliance).

The campaign’s theme of “It’s About Time” refers to the 30-year history of the
modern music video, the recent resurgence in the popularity and profitability of
music videos and the need for dancers and other performers to finally be recognized
for the talent and professionalism they bring to the music video industry. The launch
of the campaign coincided with the weekend of the MTV Video Music Awards,
which this year drew the largest audience in the network’s 30-year history.

Meanwhile, with the rise of Vevo and other ad-supported streaming services, music
videos are generating revenue for the record labels like never before. According to
ComScore, Vevo is now the second most viewed video content property after
Google sites, with 63 million unique monthly viewers. Vevo is also the top partner
channel on YouTube (a Google site), with nearly 60 million unique monthly viewers
watching monetized Vevo content on YouTube.
version of Lambada. They also claim that they invented the dancing with many
Some young dancers claim that they have invented the slower, more elegant
Lambada is Lambada
The name of the dance is Lambada. You cannot change the name of the dance.
The name of the dance belongs to the dancer, not the DJ mixers.
The name of the dance belongs to the dancer, not the musician.
The name of the dance belongs to the dancer, not the composer.
The name of the dance belongs to the dancer.
The name of the dance belongs to the dancer, not the vocalist.
zouk. It is not zouklambada. It is not zouk-lambada,
Lambada is Lambada. It is not lambazouk.It is not Lambadazouk, It is not Lambada-
I prefer Lambada, Danca Elegante for the slower dance.
Go to the lambada page and look for the red line box in the right column.